Thursday, June 2, 2011

ABORIGINAL SCARRED TREES

This photo is of a gum tree that grows at the end of my childhood street in Canberra. It's an old tree and not all that different from any other of it's species on the slopes of Mount Taylor however this tree is significant.

Not because it was a tree we climbed and built tree houses in as children but that (as I found out later in life) it had been scarred by the original Aboriginal people of the region prior to or only shortly after European discovery in 1822.

The scars were produced by skillfully cutting the desired shape with an axe (stone and after settlement steel) and stripping the bark from the tree in a sheet to be fashioned into what we would refer to as either a Coolomon or Wira (vessel or a container) or sheilds, canoes, baby carriers and, I am sure, many other general use items produced by the practice. Once the bark was removed the living 'heartwood' of the tree died leaving the enduring scar on an otherwise completely healthy tree that remains today. Depending on the lifespan of the tree Aboriginal scars can be hundreds of years old.

Because I found this new knowledge interesting I devoured the limited information available about scarred trees (identification manuals here and here) and realising that I had seen many of these trees in the ACT over the years decided last year to track as many down from memory as I could. A little Googling and the publicly 'known' trees were at Westridge in the Diplomatic district and south suburban Wanniassa with it's excellent examples of canoe trees and others. Historic Lanyon has trees I could not access and there are others identified at Pialligo and Majura also inaccessible.

I then remembered the ones from the past seemingly unknown and in far better condition than the unfortunately termite affected trees of Westridge. The childhood one in Pearce, a ghostly gum on the slopes of Red Hill and one I subsequently noticed on the Parkway in Kambah. I have been told others have been identified from Kambah to the Murrumbidgee river and it is obvious we have a numerous, rich and 'tangible' collection of living artifacts linking Aboriginal heritage to today.

I am by no means now claiming to be an expert but after seeing a lot of examples and learning to identify what is NOT a scarred tree (branch fall injury, fire damage, stock rubbing etc.) 'blind freddy' could identify one. It amazes me that the existence of these living artifacts is not more widely known and I have published the information on the trees in the ACT that I have discovered. Because of this I am occasionally contacted by people to help them identify trees in their communities that they have discovered. Some are, some are not. Last night I received an email from South Australia asking...

Email: Hi Dave,

I don't live in the ACT (I'm in SA) but was wandering around where I work today and came across this tree (attached). So is it what I think it is? Maybe a coolamon tree? It's in an area where most people won't go....on private property next to a fire track in Charleston, SA (a rural area ) My boss wasn't aware of it either.

Went to do some google searching about aboriginal trees and came across your website (great site by the way).....I knew about canoe trees (there's quite a few around the river down here) but wasn't sure what these were called till I found your site....that is, if it is one of these trees.....doesn't look like it occurred naturally however.

It is quite a ways up the tree...and didn't see any lower branches where someone could have easy access, but was thinking that if it was done a while ago, it may not have been that high up back then maybe? (due to the tree being younger?)

So do you think that's what it is?  Kind regards, Jules


Both photos enlarge...


Reply: Hi Jules,

If it was at ground level I would have dismissed it as a probable cattle rubbing however it is too high for that The shape is consistent with aboriginal scarring and unless there are visible "hatchet marks' would have been cut with a stone axe and probably pre-dates European settlement of the area.  

I would be contacting your local heritage body and reporting the tree for formal identification. In my opinion it is probably an extremely significant find in terms of surviving Aboriginal heritage and appears in very good condition. It seems to conform to all requirements of a coolomon but it is so big! I have seen much smaller scars high on trees before and wondered how the craftsmen worked so high up but they obviously had some method. I am thinking more of a shield? perhaps?

There is an identification manual here (pdf) and another here (pdf). All the info I have on our local trees is here with a video showing how they made them. I really can't help you much more but would be very interested in discovering the outcome... Cheers Dave
 -------------------------------------------------------------- end

And I am very interested... I think the South Oz community that has this heritage asset are very fortunate and hope they appreciate it still existing with so many lost to bushfire, age and past land clearing practices. I also hope that somebody 'qualified' to identify these remarkable relics does so and gives the tree the protection that it's heritage value warrants.

Share-

4 comments:

  1. I found another one of these whilst trekking on the weekend. It had a definate iron hatchet cut bottom right side, but could not tell if done at the time or later. But very interesting to find so many of these in my forest.
    Regards, Keith.
    http://woodsrunnersdiary.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Settlers also removed bark for the roofs of their first slab huts. Usually the shape would be rectangle. If this is not the case please remember to take some pictures and post them Keith. Look after them... Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know this post is a little old now, but just in case anyone wanders into it I thought I should add an archaeologists perspective.

    The tree in the SA example is certainly NOT an aboriginal scarred tree. Trees grow 'out' by adding a new layer each year, not 'up', so a scar will not move. The best evidence of this is the fact the the heartwood is not living and will not move. Also, the regrowth around the scar is very minor, and only represents a few years growth (actually, probably decades, but either way not worth mentioning in archaeological grounds). If you enlarge the first photo you can see some of the original bark that has died back showing an iregular shape which is indicative of natural causes.

    Scarred trees are a fairly contentious issue as they are, as you mention, remarkable relics but are also often misidentified, even by professionals. However, I think that few archaeologists would support the claim that it was an Aboriginal scarred tree.

    Don't be disheartened though! If you find what you suspect is a scarred tree just contact your local heritage office, a nearby university (assuming it has an archaeology department), or even a local community heritage group or expert - most will be pleased to help you!

    Dave, although I disagree with you on this particular tree, I commend you for the promotion of heritage values and a generally interesting blog.

    Cheers!

    Richard

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Richard. It is an old post. Unfortunately in the ACT there is not much interest shown in them. Government or Educational. I have come across dozens and have enquired on a few to no avail. Most only remain because of tree protection laws not related to scars. I'm certainly no expert. Cheers Dave

      Delete

The Blue Range Hut

I spent Friday and Saturday of last week at the Blue Range campground out past Urriara on Brindabella Road. We hired the rustic corrugate...